By Enitan Abdultawab The absence of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology in the Africa Cup of Nations, AFCON qualifiers has come under scrutiny following Ghana’s 2 0 defeat to Côte d’Ivoire in Bouaké on Thursday. Ghana coach Carlos Queiroz was particularly unhappy with the decision that led to Côte d’Ivoire’s second goal, after referee Mustapha Ghorbal awarded the hosts a penalty for Abdul Fatawu Issahaku’s challenge on Malick Yalcouyé.
Franck Kessié converted the spot kick to extend Côte d’Ivoire’s lead, but the decision became a major talking point after the match. Queiroz, after watching television replays, described the penalty call as “a joke”. In addition, football fans think Magadascar’s first goal against Nigeria could have gone under a check if VAR existed, although further replays showed that Ehsan Kari was indeed not offside.
Hence, these controversies have raised questions about why these incidents could not be reviewed with VAR. Why VAR is absent in AFCON qualifiers The absence of the technology from AFCON qualifying matches is not simply a matter of choosing not to use it. VAR requires substantial technical and operational arrangements before it can be deployed at a match.
A stadium must have suitable camera systems, communication infrastructure, trained VAR officials and other technical facilities capable of supporting the review process. These requirements can be difficult to guarantee across all the venues used for a continental qualifying competition. Unlike the AFCON finals, which are played at a limited number of selected stadiums, the qualifiers involve teams from all 54 CAF member associations and are staged at venues with varying levels of infrastructure.
The Stade de la Paix in Bouaké, where Ghana faced Côte d’Ivoire, is capable of supporting VAR. The stadium hosted matches during the 2023 Africa Cup of Nations, where VAR was deployed throughout the tournament. The